Case details for Daniel Jory DYER

Name: Daniel Jory DYER

Name: INTUITION LIGHTING LIMITED

Date of Birth: 6 / 3 / 1976

Date Order Starts: 29 / 6 / 2026

Disqualification Length: 12 Years 0 Month(s)

CRO Number: 10376959

Last Known Address: Managers Accommodation Waterloo Inn,, West Nash Road,, Nash,, , NEWPORT,, NP18 2BZ

Conduct: On 23 June 2020 Daniel Dyer (“Mr Dyer”) applied for a Bounce Back Loan (“BBL”) in the sum of £48,800 on behalf of Intuition Lighting Limited (“Intuition”) when he knew, or ought to have known, that Intuition was not eligible to receive it, and did not use the funds for the economic benefit of the company. In particular ? Under the BBL scheme businesses could apply for a loan of between £2,000 and £50,000 subject to a maximum of up to 25% of turnover. The turnover figure applicable was that for the calendar year 2019, or where a business was established after 01 January 2019, it was the estimated annual turnover. The funds were to be used for the economic benefit of the company only. ? Intuition was incorporated on 15 September 2016, and active shortly thereafter. Therefore, it was not eligible to estimate its annual turnover on the BBL application. ? The company’s filed accounts for year ended 30 September 2018 show a turnover of £325 and those for the 6 month period to March 2019 show turnover of £815. ? The company’s bank statements show that in the period 01 January 2019 to 31 December 2019, income of £920 was received. On this basis, the company did not have sufficient turnover to be eligible for the minimum loan available, as this required a turnover of at least £8,000 per annum. ? On 29 May 2020, Mr Dyer bought the business and was appointed as the sole director. ? On 23 June 2020, Mr Dyer applied for a BBL in the sum of £48,800 from Bank A on behalf of Intuition, declaring the Company’s annual turnover as £220,000. ? On 24 June 2020, BBL funds of £48,800 were paid into the Company’s bank account with Bank A. In the subsequent period 29 June 2020 to 13 July 2020, BBL funds totalling £33,000 were paid to a connected company, and £15,700 was paid to Mr Dyer personally, the payments not being for the economic benefit of Intuition. On 01 July 2020 Mr Dyer dishonestly caused Intuition to obtain a second BBL in the sum of £50,000 when it was not eligible to receive it because he knew that the company had already applied for and obtained a £48,800 BBL from Bank A, and he knew, or ought to have known, that Intuition did not have sufficient turnover to be eligible for a loan of that value. Further, he did not use the funds received for the economic benefit of the company. In particular: ? Under the BBL scheme businesses could apply for a loan of between £2,000 and £50,000 subject to a maximum of up to 25% of turnover. The turnover figure applicable was that for the calendar year 2019, or where a business was established after 01 January 2019, it was the estimated annual turnover. The funds were to be used for the economic benefit of the company only. ? Intuition was incorporated on 15 September 2016, and active shortly thereafter. Therefore, it was not eligible to estimate its annual turnover on the BBL application. ? The company’s filed accounts for year ended 30 September 2018 show a turnover of £325 and those for the 6 month period to March 2019 show turnover of £815. ? The company’s bank statements show that in the period 01 January 2019 to 31 December 2019, income of £920 was received. On this basis, the company did not have sufficient turnover to be eligible for the minimum loan available, as this required a turnover of at least £8,000 per annum. ? On 23 June 2020 Intuition submitted a first BBL application to Bank A requesting a loan in the sum of £48,800, the funds being received on 24 June 2020. ? On 01 July 2020 Mr Dyer submitted a second BBL application on behalf of Intuition to Bank B requesting a loan in the sum of £50,000, declaring the Company’s annual turnover as £220,000. As part of the application process Mr Dyer signed a declaration which stated this was the only BBL applied for and that a BBL had not already been received, in the knowledge that the Company had already received a BBL of £48,800 from Bank A. ? On 01 July 2020 BBL funds of £50,000 were paid into the Company’s bank account held with Bank B. In the subsequent period 13 July 2020 to 26 January 2021, net funds totalling £44,500 were paid from Bank B to a connected company, these payments not being for the economic benefit of Intuition. ? On 26 October 2022 Intuition was subject to a Winding up Order on the petition of Bank B. Total liabilities at liquidation amount to £103,558, of this sum £49,222 is owed in respect of the BBL with Bank A, £49,511 is owed in respect of the BBL with Bank B and £4,825 is in respect of monies stated to be owed to Mr Dyer. 

This information is correct as at 12 / 6 / 2026



If you believe this page contains any errors, please email legalservices@insolvency.gov.uk with details of the error that you have found.